Dana Milbank of the Washington Post wrote recently that he won't be bringing up Sarah Palin during the month of February. (See the article here .) Though I found it amusing, others on the Washington Post site found it horrifying to censor any subject. Is it really censorship? I suppose were Palin to declare her candidacy for office and Milbank refused to cover it, then it would be censorship. However, given that Palin isn't a governor or any other public official any longer, why give her so much credit? Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter say inflammatory things all the time, and aside from FoxNews, no one pays them any mind. I say this isn't censorship but a reevaluation. Saturday Night Live proved long ago that making light of Palin wasn't difficult. (See the "I can see Russia from my house" video by clicking here .) There are 171,476 words in the Oxford English Dictionary and yet instead of using one of them, she fumbled her way into " refudiate